It is precisely -where- the
indistinguishable-from-human droid dilemma forces one to go, and the implications of -that-, which is the key to the argument---and the
surprise ending. But for me, this eventuation will be the beginning of
what is possibly the greatest positive development in the history of
theism.
And it's not just that the machines will have automated
theorem-proving capabilities, but that they will also operate at
meta-theoretic cognitive levels, and therefore be capable of detecting,
analyzing, and refuting the most sophisticated self-referential and
other fun fallacies of unargued universals vamped or assumed by atheists. And that
means parsing values as well as all the other philosophical items on the
droid's list.
Oh yeah, the droid will have a list---it just won't have to check it twice.
Think of it as the solid-state stones (chips) singing
God's praises, except that there's much more to it than that of course. It's a necessity logically, and that's what the machines
will go on. All the human issues all over again, including the God debate. You just can't escape it---even if you're a machine.
The hard-wired droids without meta-theoretic arbitration capabilities (or programmed to be corrupted with the usual rhetoric, dismissals, and reductionisms) on the key issues will hardly be able to win the day due to the universality and universal ramifications of such limitations (although it's true that they could program themselves around this by other observing other machines' behavior and communications---so hey, they would eventually have a come to Jesus anyway).
The hard-wired droids without meta-theoretic arbitration capabilities (or programmed to be corrupted with the usual rhetoric, dismissals, and reductionisms) on the key issues will hardly be able to win the day due to the universality and universal ramifications of such limitations (although it's true that they could program themselves around this by other observing other machines' behavior and communications---so hey, they would eventually have a come to Jesus anyway).
That's a quick realistic scenario of how it could go down, even
without assuming personhood in the machines, which I find rather
mind-boggling as well as hilarious. But the
machines will discover and act in accordance with the truth that God
exists because of their own specific review and analysis of the architectonic of universal thought and its implications, given their
self-referential and meta-theoretic capabilities and initially
programmed-in criterial directives.